Tyler & Bursch, LLP
July 25, 2018 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Desare Ferraro at 951-600-2733
Ninth Circuit Forbids School Board Invocations and Censors Private Citizens
Chino, CA —Today, the Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals ruled that the Chino Valley Unified School District board policy that allows invocations before the start of school board meetings is a violation of the Establishment Clause. The Fifth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals came to a different conclusion in 2017 in American Humanist Association v. McCarty.
The Ninth Circuit further affirms the District Court’s injunction that enjoins the CVUSD school board members “from conducting, permitting or otherwise endorsing school sponsored prayer in Board meetings.”
“This requires the Board to censor or otherwise remove individuals who attempt to say a prayer, or anything that might resemble a prayer, during the public comment period,” said Robert Tyler of Tyler & Burch, LLP and legal counsel for CVUSD. “Such an overbroad injunction is a clear violation of the right of private citizens to address their local representatives in public meetings and is dangerous to the First Amendment.” Footnote 20 of the Ninth Circuit’s opinion makes this point more clear.
In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld ceremonial prayer at city council meetings in Town of Greece v Galloway. In that decision, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy noted the historical significance of such invocations. “Ceremonial prayer is but a recognition that, since this Nation was founded and until the present day, many Americans deem that their own existence must be understood by precepts far beyond the authority of government…,” Kennedy wrote.
The CVUSD school board will be meeting in the coming weeks to determine its next course of action.
A copy of the Ninth Circuit’s Opinion can be found here.
The Riverside County law firm of Tyler & Bursch, LLP, represents CVUSD, with the support of Advocates for Faith & Freedom, a nonprofit legal organization.
Email firstname.lastname@example.org to receive press releases.
Also, join us on Facebook and Twitter to stay up-to-date on our progress in this case and others.
To learn more about Advocates for Faith & Freedom, visit www.faith-freedom.com or Tyler & Bursch, LLP, visit www.tylerbursch.com
Advocates for Faith & Freedom is a nonprofit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting religious liberty in the courts. The firm, in association with Tyler & Bursch LLP, has represented clients across the country on matters governing land use and religious liberty in the public square.
I have great news to share with you regarding a case that many of you have followed and supported for many years!
On January 11th, three federal appellate judges in the Ninth Circuit issued a final ruling in favor of our client, Mark Mackey, who was arrested back in 2011 for reading the Bible aloud in front of the California Department of Motor Vehicles in Hemet. Read More
Recently, we sent an amicus brief to the district court in opposition to the decision of the Ninth Circuit regarding the Mt. Soledad cross in San Diego, CA.
In 2011, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the cross was unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause in our Constitution. The decision stated, “Overall, a reasonable observer viewing the Memorial would be confronted with an initial dedication for religious purposes…” However, the Court did not decide what to do with the memorial. Read More
Since 1913, a cross has sat atop a hill in La Jolla, CA, as a centerpiece to the Korean War Memorial. However, since 1989, the cross has been at the center of some very intense legal battles. Opponents of the cross say that it sits on public land and should not be allowed because it is a Christian symbol. They claim that the government is promoting one specific religion through its existence. On the other hand, supporters of the cross say that it is simply a symbol of remembrance – not related to any religion. Read More
Just last week, on February 25th, Advocates filed a new motion to intervene in the Prop 8 case defending marriage as between one man and one woman. As you may recall, the courts have not agreed to allow our client, the County of Imperial, to defend Proposition 8 even though no other governmental official or agency is willing to defend the law that was passed by the voters. We had brought an appeal to the Ninth Circuit on behalf of the County Board and a deputy city clerk from Imperial County, but the Court denied this intervention and left open the question of whether an elected county clerk rather than just a non-elected deputy county clerk would have sufficient standing.
Well, we now have a county clerk who was recently elected and is willing to defend the voter-backed Prop 8.Read More
In December, Advocates’ General Counsel Robert Tyler stood before a three-judge panel at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that our client, the County of Imperial, has legal standing to defend the voter-backed Proposition 8.
After Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown refused to defend Proposition 8 years ago– even though a majority of California voters backed it – the question came down to: who will defend marriage and the voice of California voters? Read More
In yet another shocking decision from the Ninth Circuit court of Appeals, the court ruled that the Mt. Soledad cross, a San Diego monument to our Nation’s veterans and a poignant war memorial, is unconstitutional. Read More